NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dean v Phung [2015] NSWSC 816 Hearing dates: 3 July 2015 Date of orders: 21 July 2015 Decision date: 21 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: (1) The Plaintiff's notice of motion filed 23 September 2013 be dismissed;
(2) the Plaintiff's notice of motion filed 5 March 2015 be dismissed; and
(3) the Plaintiff pay Guild Insurance Limited's costs of the notices of motion. Catchwords: COSTS – application for costs order against insurer of insolvent defendant – plaintiff sued defendant dentist for grossly excessive dental treatment – insurer conducted defence on behalf of dentist – conceded dental treatment was excessive – plaintiff sued in negligence and assault – plaintiff alleged consent to treatment fraudulently obtained – plaintiff alleged damages not limited by Civil Liability Act because of intentional acts of defendant – defendant admitted negligence but denied assault and fraudulently obtaining consent to treatment – at first instance plaintiff obtained damages for negligence and costs order but balance of claim failed – on appeal plaintiff succeeded in establishing assault and intentional act of defendant – finding that consent procured by fraud also made – plaintiff obtained award of exemplary damages – insurer denied indemnity including for costs at final instance – plaintiff sought costs of proceedings at first instance from insurer – contended that insurer represented that indemnity would not be denied even if fraud or similar conduct established.
HELD: insurer did not make representation – application dismissed. Legislation Cited: - Civil Liability Act 2002 – s 3B(1), s 21 - Civil Procedure Act 2005 – s 98 - Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 – s 6 Cases Cited: - Advanced Arbor Services Pty Ltd v Phung [2009] NSWSC 1331 - Dean v Phung [2009] NSWSC 1333 - Dean v Phung [2011] NSWSC 653 - Dean v Phung [2012] NSWCA 223 - Dean v Phung (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 116 - Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky [1992] FCA 557; 39 FCR 31 - Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Todd (No 2) [2004] UKPC 39; [2004] 1 WLR 2807 - FPM Constructions Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Blue Mountains [2005] NSWCA 340 - HRX Pty Ltd v Scott [2013] NSWSC 451 - Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 178 - Lam v Ausintel Investments Australia Pty Ltd (1990) 97 FLR 458 - Murphy v Young & Co's Brewery & Anor [1997] 1 WLR 1591 - QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Hotchin [2013] NSWSC 315 - Selig v Wealthsure Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 18 - TGA Chapman Ltd v Christopher [1998] 1 WLR 12 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Todd Owen Dean – Plaintiff Dr Mark Van Thien Phung – Defendant Guild Insurance Limited (GIL) – Third Party Representation: Counsel: D.R.J. Toomey – Plaintiff B.J.A. Shields – Third Party
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate