NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: O'Grady v R [2015] NSWCCA 168 Hearing dates: 16 March 2015 Date of orders: 03 July 2015 Decision date: 03 July 2015 Before: Bathurst CJ: [1] Rothman J: [4] McCallum J: [51] Decision: (1) Extension of time granted; (2) Leave to appeal granted; (3) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – Muldrock error – application of principles on extension of time to appeal following High Court in Kentwell v The Queen – extension of time granted as reasons for delay explained and in the interests of justice – appeal dismissed as no lesser sentence warranted in law. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; (2014) 88 ALJR 947 Kentwell v The Queen (No 2) [2015] NSWCCA 96 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Neal v The Queen [1982] HCA 55; (1982) 149 CLR 305 O'Grady v The Queen [2013] NSWCCA 281 O'Grady v The Queen [2014] HCA 38; (2014) 88 ALJR 960 Parker v Director of Public Prosecutions (1992) 65 A Crim R 209 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew O'Grady (Accused) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: G. Bashir SC/with J. Roy (Applicant) J. Girdham SC (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate