NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dank v Whittaker (No 6) [2015] NSWSC 827 Hearing dates: On written submissions Date of orders: 25 June 2015 Decision date: 25 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs of 6 December 2013 and the costs thrown away by virtue of having to reformulate objections to the 114 and 118 pleadings in light of the proposed further amended statements of claim in those proceedings as agreed or assessed on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: COSTS Cases Cited: Dank v Whittaker (No 5) [2014] NSW SC 914 Category: Costs Parties: 2013/157114: Stephen Dank (plaintiff) Paul Whittaker (first defendant) Dr Trickia Kavanagh (third defendant) Darren Kane (fourth defendant) Rebecca Wilson (fifth defendant) James Hooper (sixth defendant) Josh Massoud (seventh defendant)
2013/157118: Stephen Dank (plaintiff) Nationwide News Pty Ltd (defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Smark SC (plaintiff) T Blackburn SC, L Barnett (defendants)
Solicitors: 2013/157114 Cambridge Law (plaintiff) Ashurst Australia (first, fifth, sixth and seventh defendants) Kennedys (third defendant) Wotton & Kearney (fourth defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate