NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dijakovic v Perez [2015] NSWCA 174 Hearing dates: 30 April 2015 Decision date: 29 June 2015 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [129]; McCallum J at [134] Decision: (1)Leave to appeal be granted. (2)The appeal be allowed. (3)The orders made by the District Court on 30 May 2014 be set aside. (4)In lieu thereof: (a)grant leave to the plaintiff pursuant to s 109 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) to commence the proceedings; (b)the plaintiff's cost of the notice of motion filed 14 March 2014 be the plaintiff's costs in the proceedings. (5)The respondent to pay the applicant's/appellant's costs of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal. Catchwords: MOTOR ACCIDENTS COMPENSATION – failure to commence proceedings for damages within three years of accident – requirement of leave – Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), s 66(2) and s 109(3) – whether evidence established a "full and satisfactory" explanation for the delay – whether monetary threshold likely to be met – primary judge erred in concluding otherwise Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Act 1988 (NSW) s 43A Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) s 3, 60, 66, 82, 85A, 89A, 89C, 90, 91, 109 Cases Cited: 2 Elizabeth Bay Road Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 73943 [2014] NSWCA 409 Berowra Holdings Pty Ltd v Gordon [2006] HCA 32; 225 CLR 364 Brierley v Ellis [2014] NSWCA 230; 67 MVR 282 Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1989] HCA 62; 169 CLR 379 Eades v Gunestepe [2012] NSWCA 204; 61 MVR 328 Harika v Tupaea [2003] NSWCA 332; 58 NSWLR 675 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Karambelas v Zaknic (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 433 Mancini v Thompson [2002] NSWCA 38 Russo v Aiello [2003] HCA 53; 215 CLR 643 Sinclair v Darwich [2010] NSWCA 195; 77 NSWLR 166 Walker v Howard [2009] NSWCA 408; 78 NSWLR 161 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark Ivan John Dijakovic (Applicant) Alfonso Ricard Sarralde Perez (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Sheldon SC / E Welsh (Applicant) M A Cleary (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate