NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mick Fabar Constructions Pty Ltd v Robert Symes & Kim Louise Filmer [2015] NSWCATAP 123 Hearing dates: 20 May 2015 Date of orders: 26 June 2015 Decision date: 26 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: The Hon D.Cowdroy QC, Principal Member S.Thode, Senior Member Decision: The application for leave be dismissed. The appeal be dismissed. Each party pay its own costs of the appeal, unless, within 21 days, either party makes an application for a different order, in which event the costs will be reserved. In the event that either party seeks an order as to costs in its favour, the following is to apply: The party of such application is to file a short submission of no more than three pages stating why costs should be paid by the other party. A party claiming costs shall file and serve submissions in support of such claim within 7 days of the making of these orders. Each party is to respond, in no more than three pages, to any application for costs within 7 days of receipt of the other party's application. The Appeal Panel will then determine the issue of costs on the papers. Catchwords: Administrative Law - Appeal – Civil and Administrative Tribunal - Work Order pursuant to s48O of the Home Building Act 1989 – exercise of discretion to make a work order Legislation Cited: Home Building Act 1989 Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17; Polites v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1988) 16 ALD 707; Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280; Wainohu v The State of New South Wales (2011) 243 LR 181; Sydney Supermarkets Pty Ltd v Xu [2009] NSWADTAP 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mick Fabar Constructions Pty Ltd (Appellant) Robert Symes & Kim Louise Filmer (Respondents) Representation: Mr Young, for the Appellant Ms Fraser & Ms Webb, for the Respondents File Number(s): AP 14/60533 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NCAT Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 25 November 2014 Before: D. Goldstein Senior Member File Number(s): HB 10/44392
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate