NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Alceon Group Pty Ltd v Rose [2015] NSWSC 868 Hearing dates: 23 February 2015; 24 February 2015; 25 February 2015 Decision date: 03 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Simpson J Decision: The parties to bring in short minutes of order to reflect the conclusions in this judgment Catchwords: CONTRACT - performance - plaintiff lending institution - loan to company guaranteed by first and second defendants - third party guarantors - mortgage - where plaintiff seeks to enforce personal guarantees and rights under mortgage
CIVIL LAW - whether plaintiff engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct, Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth); Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) - conduct not misleading or deceptive - claim against first defendant made out
CONTRACT - obligation to explain purport and effect of transaction - Garcia v National Australia Bank Ltd [1998] HCA 48; 194 CLR 395 - third party guarantor not given competent, independent or objective advice - obligation of solicitor undertaking role of giving advice to third party guarantor - conflict of interest - lender aware of conflict of interest - lender complicit in inadequate advice being given - unconscionable to enforce guarantee against second defendant - unconscionable contracts are unjust and ought not be enforced, Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW), s 9 Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW), s 7, s 9 Oaths Act 1900 (NSW) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; 151 CLR 447 Garcia v National Australia Bank Ltd [1998] HCA 48; 194 CLR 395 Yerkey v Jones [1939] HCA 3; 63 CLR 649 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alceon Group Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/First Cross-defendant/Second Cross-defendant) Peter Francis Rose (First Defendant/Second Cross-defendant) Betty Nola Rose (Second Defendant/First Cross-claimant) Representation: Counsel: M A Ashhurst SC/S B Docker (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant) In person (First Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant) N J Kidd SC (Second Defendant/First Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate