NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd v Sztrochlic [2015] NSWSC 885 Hearing dates: 23 and 24 June 2015 Date of orders: 06 July 2015 Decision date: 06 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fagan J Decision: (1) Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $2,113,129.10 inclusive of interest up to judgment. (2) Order that the Defendant pay the Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: CONTRACT – guarantee – offer – whether acceptance by conduct, namely the continued supply of goods – intention to be bound ESTOPPEL – promissory estoppel – representation –reasonableness of reliance by representee DEEDS – formal requirements – whether document intended to operate as a deed – conflicting indications – sealing – Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 38 Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Personal Property Security Act 2009 (Cth) Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) Cases Cited: Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council [2001] NSWCA 61; (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 Dalgety Australia Ltd v Harris [1977] 1 NSWLR 324 Empirnall Holdings Pty Ltd v Machon Paull (1988) 14 NSWLR 523 Hammond v JP Morgan Trust Australia Ltd [2012] NSWCA 295 Laidlaw v Hillier Hewitt Elsely Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 44 Manton v Parabolic Pty Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 361 Mirzikinian v Waterhouse Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 296 Segboer v AJ Richardson Properties Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 253 Standard Chartered Bank Aust Ltd v Bank of China (1991) 23 NSWLR 164 400 George St (Qld) Pty Ltd v BG International Ltd [2010] Qd R 245; (2010) 2 QDR 302 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Raphael Sztrochlic (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: T Maltz (Plaintiff) VF Kerr (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate