NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Glen v Sullivan [2015] NSWCA 191 Hearing dates: 26 June 2015 Decision date: 09 July 2015 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Ward JA at [2]; Sackville AJA at [3] Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: DAMAGES – motor vehicle accident - pre-existing psychiatric condition – whether aggravation of pre-existing psychiatric condition ceased before trial – primary Judge finds that any aggravation of the pre-existing condition ceased before the trial – application of Watts v Rake and Purkess v Crittenden – whether the defendant had onus of adducing evidence that the causal relationship between the accident and the continuing disabilities had ceased – whether defendant satisfied that onus Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5D Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), s 131 Cases Cited: Glen v Sullivan (District Court, 6 June 2014, unrep) Purkess v Crittenden [1965] HCA 34; 114 CLR 164 Ridolfi v Hammond [2012] NSWCA 3 Seltsam Pty Ltd v Ghaleb [2005] NSWCA 208 Watts v Rake [1960] HCA 58; 108 CLR 158 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anna Glen (Appellant) Norman Patrick Sullivan (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Sheldon SC / Ms E Welsh (Appellant) K Rewell SC/ Ms M Kumar (Respondent)
Solicitors: Brydens Compensation Lawyers (Appellant) QBE In House Legal Claims (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/189383 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Civil Date of Decision: 6 June 2014 Before: Letherbarrow SC DCJ File Number(s): 2013/230823
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate