NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Beslic v MLC Ltd [2015] NSWSC 908 Hearing dates: 19 June 2015 Date of orders: 10 July 2015 Decision date: 10 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Robb J Decision: The parties are requested to bring in short minutes of order Catchwords: EVIDENCE – advance ruling as to admissibility pursuant to s 192A of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – plaintiff/applicant seeks advance ruling in respect of affidavit and expert opinion evidence – held Court may decide whether it is appropriate to give the ruling before embarking upon hearing of application to sustain the ruling – test is one of appropriateness, falling within the discretion of the judge in the circumstances of the case – premature for the Court to rule on appropriateness – because first, leave given to second defendant to file further report of expert opinion could remedy shortcomings – second, plaintiff did not precisely and informatively identify the rulings sought Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (UCPR) Cases Cited: Lambert Leasing Inc v QBE Insurance Australia Ltd [2012] NSWSC 953 Sydney Attractions Group Pty Ltd v Schulman [2012] NSWSC 951 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Damien Beslic (plaintiff/applicant) MLC Ltd (first defendant/respondent) AXA Financial Planning (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: E Romaniuk SC/ M A Kumar (plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate