NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Alkanaan [2015] NSWSC 911 Hearing dates: 16 February 2015, 26 February 2015 Date of orders: 27 February 2015 Decision date: 10 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: Inland Revenue Commissioners v Rossminster Ltd [1980] AC 952 Ousley v The Queen [1997] HCA 49; (1997) 192 CLR 69 Tran Nominees Pty Ltd v Scheffler (1986) 42 SASR 361 Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – admissibility of ERISP – whether admissions made influenced by threats – whether extension of detention warrant valid – essential facts to exclude ERISP not proved – ERISP admitted Legislation Cited: Controlled Substances Act 1984 (SA) Evidence Act 1995 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Regulation 2005 Listening Devices Act 1969 (Vic) Cases Cited: Inland Revenue Commissioners v Rossminster Ltd [1980] AC 952 Ousley v The Queen [1997] HCA 49; (1997) 192 CLR 69 Tran Nominees Pty Ltd v Scheffler (1986) 42 SASR 361 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Crown Falah Alkanaan (Accused) Representation: Counsel: C Patrick (Crown) G Wendler (Accused)
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Legal Aid NSW (Accused) File Number(s): 2013/40590 Publication restriction: Not Applicable
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate