NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Yau Hang Chan (No 13) [2015] NSWSC 917 Hearing dates: 6 July 2015 Date of orders: 13 July 2015 Decision date: 13 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt J Decision: Applications refused. Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – alleged contempt before Local Court proceedings – vexatious litigant – fitness hearing – reasons for various rulings during fitness hearing – reasons for refusal of adjournment and disqualification applications – objections to expert report – further applications for adjournment refused Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW) Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney General v Chan [2011] NSWSC 1315 Prothonotary v Chan (Supreme Court (NSW), Beech-Jones J, 22 June 2015, unrep) Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Yau Hang Chan (No 6) [2014] NSWSC 153 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Yau Hang Chan (No 8) [2014] NSWSC 596 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Yau Hang Chan (No 12) [2015] NSWSC 572 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Yau Hang Chan (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms B Baker (Plaintiff)
Solicitors: IV Knight, Crown Solicitor's Office (Plaintiff) Mr Chan (self-represented) File Number(s): 2012/350266 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate