NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Macquarie Bank Ltd v Juno Holdings S.a.r.l [2015] NSWSC 919 Hearing dates: 8 July 2015 Decision date: 08 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Stay refused Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – stay of proceedings – application to enforce judgment obtained in Netherlands Antilles – whether proceedings should be stayed pending execution by bailiff of the District Court of Amsterdam against shares of defendant's subsidiary Legislation Cited: Foreign Judgments Act 1991 (Cth) Foreign Judgments Regulations 1992 (Cth) Cases Cited: Bella Products Pty Ltd v Creative Designs International Ltd [2009] FCA 868; 258 ALR 538 Bond Corporation Pty Ltd v Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd (1987) 14 FCR 193 Hughes Motor Service Pty Ltd v Wang Computer Pty Ltd (1978) 35 FLR 346 In the matter of Treadtel International Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1406 L Grollo Darwin Management Pty Ltd v Victor Plaster Products Pty Ltd (1978) 33 FLR 170 Muller v Fencott (1981) 53 FLR 184 Sterling Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd v The Boots Company (Australia) Pty Ltd (1992) 34 FCR 287 Texts Cited: M Davies, A Bell and P Brereton, Nygh's Conflict of Laws in Australia, (9th ed 2014, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Macquarie Bank Limited (Plaintiff/Respondent) Juno Holdings S.a.r.l (Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: I M Jackman SC with J A Hogan-Doran (Plaintiff/Respondent) P M Wood with D R Sulan (Defendant/Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate