NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: John Wayne TSIAKAS v R [2015] NSWCCA 187 Hearing dates: 13 May 2015 Date of orders: 17 July 2015 Decision date: 17 July 2015 Before: Leeming JA at [1] Johnson J at [2] Beech-Jones J at [3] Decision: (1) The application for leave to appeal against the sentence imposed on 24 July 2013 be allowed; and
(2) The appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: SENTENCE APPEAL – theft of motor vehicles – break and enter dwelling – drive manner dangerous while police in pursuit – substantial custodial sentence imposed – alleged incompetence of legal representative at sentence hearing – failure to obtain and tender psychiatric report – alleged failure to advise offender about assisting police in locating co-offender – failure to obtain evidence from family member – necessity to demonstrate miscarriage of justice – must show material of real substance not tendered – not shown – leave granted but appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: - Crimes Act 1900 – s 51B, s 112(2), s 105A(1), s 154A(1) - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - Div 1A Part 4, s 32(1), s 53A - Criminal Appeal Act 1912 – s 6(1) - Criminal Procedure Act 1986 – s 166 - Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 – s 4 - Road Transport (Driver Licensing) Act 1998 – s 25A - Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 – s 9(1) Cases Cited: - Assistant Commissioner Condon v Pompano Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 7; 252 CLR 38 - Beale v R [2015] NSWCCA 120 - Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; 249 CLR 571 - Garland v R [2009] NSWCCA 217 - Jinnette v R [2012] NSWCCA 217 - Kennedy v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 260 - Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs. Re; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6; 214 CLR 1 - Munro v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 350 - Nudd v R [2006] HCA 9, 80 ALJR 614 - Puan v R [2009] NSWCCA 194 - Pym v R [2014] NSWCCA 182 - R v Abbott (1985) 17 A Crim R 355 - R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 - TKWJ v R [2002] HCA 46; 212 CLR 124 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Wayne Tsiakas – Applicant Regina – Respondent Representation: Counsel: E. Ozen – Applicant Ms N.L. Williams – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate