NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wang v Yamamoto [2015] NSWSC 942 Hearing dates: 24 June 2015 Date of orders: 17 July 2015 Decision date: 17 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) Leave to appeal in relation to the decision dated 8 October 2014 is refused.
(2) The appeals are dismissed.
(3)The further amended summons filed 25 February 2015 is dismissed.
(4) The decisions of his Honour Magistrate Bradd dated 4 September 2014 and 8 October 2014 are affirmed.
(5) The plaintiffs are to pay the defendant's costs on an ordinary basis as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: APPEAL FROM LOCAL COURT – Local Court Act 2007 (NSW) – assessment by Magistrate of award of abatement of rent – whether Magistrate gave adequate reasons – whether defendant in the Local Court denied procedural fairness – whether Magistrate erred in awarding indemnity costs against defendant in the Local Court – whether Magistrate erroneously took into account non complying offer of compromise and lack of prospects of success when awarding indemnity costs Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Local Court Act 2007 (NSW) Cases Cited: Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon [1993] HCA 4; (1993) 176 CLR 344 Beale v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1997) 48 NSWLR 340 Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Dare v Pulham [1982] HCA 70; (1982) 148 CLR 658 Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Work Cover Authority (No 2) (2005) 13 VR 435; [2005] VSCA 298 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Keith v Gal [2013] NSWCA 339 Pollard v RRR Corporation Pty Limited [2009] NSWCA 110 Potts v Miller [1940] 64 CLR 282 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Limited (1987) NSWLR 247 Stoker v Adecco Gemvale Constructions Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 449 Texts Cited: Halsbury's Laws of Australia Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Wang (First Plaintiff) Mary Li (Second Plaintiff) Tomoko Yamamoto (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R Sheldon SC with J Lee (First and Second Plaintiffs) M Young SC (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate