NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Smith v R [2015] NSWCCA 193 Hearing dates: 12 June 2015 Decision date: 17 July 2015 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Simpson JA at [2]; Hamill J at [75] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against sentence granted;
(2) Appeal allowed, sentence imposed on 8 August 2014 quashed;
(3) In lieu thereof, the applicant is sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 7 years and 6 months commencing on 12 February 2013 and expiring on 11 August 2020 with a balance of term of 2 years and 6 months expiring on 11 February 2023. Catchwords: APPEAL - sentence - manslaughter by shooting - self-defence, excessive force that inflicts death - Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 421 - whether conduct a reasonable response in circumstances as perceived by applicant - whether applicant believed deceased was armed with a gun - whether sentencing judge failed to identify the circumstances as the applicant perceived them - sentencing judge omitted to find the applicant perceived the deceased was armed with a gun and willing to use it against him - omission affected evaluation of unreasonableness of applicant's response - error established - applicant re-sentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), Pt 4 Div 1A, s 21A(3)(c) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 418, s 419, s 421 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; 249 CLR 571 Davis v R [2015] NSWCCA 90 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Forbes [2005] NSWCCA 377; 160 A Crim R 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Graham Smith (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Brady/A Rose (Applicant) N Adams SC/S Palaniappan (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate