NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: IK Chemists Pty v CHOF4 Artarmon Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCATAP 144 Hearing dates: 27 February 2015 Date of orders: 16 July 2015 Decision date: 16 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Mr L Robberds QC, Senior Member Mr R Titterton, Senior Member Decision: The appeal is allowed. The matter is remitted to the Consumer and Commercial Division of the Tribunal for determination. Catchwords: Retail Tenancy Act – monetary limit on Tribunal's jurisdiction – whether Supreme Court claim by respondent sublessor in excess of monetary limit is to be taken into account on monetary limit of Tribunal's jurisdiction – whether retail dispute between the parties was for a monetary sum in excess of the jurisdictional limit of the Tribunal. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil Procedure Act 2005 Consumer Claims Act 1998 Retail Leases Act 1994 Cases Cited: Brashes Convenience Store Pty Ltd v Pitt & Castlereagh Pty Ltd [2013] NSWADT118 Craig v The State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 Curcio v AMP Warringah Mall Pty Ltd [2013] NSWADT F v National Crime Authority (1998) 83 FCR 99 Jonsson v Arkway Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 815 Poat v Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal [2004] NSWSC 947 Prestige Residential Marketing Pty Limited v A & M Short Investments Pty Limited [2005] NSWSC 485 Category: Principal judgment Parties: IK Chemists Pty (Appellant) CHOF4 Artarmon Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate