NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: MRM v R [2015] NSWCCA 195 Hearing dates: 11 March 2015 Date of orders: 24 July 2015 Decision date: 24 July 2015 Before: Meagher JA at [1] Simpson JA at [7] Schmidt J at [65] Decision: (1)Leave to appeal against sentence granted; (2)Appeal allowed, sentences imposed in respect of Counts 7 and 8 set aside; (3)In lieu thereof, the applicant be sentenced as follows: (a)On Count 10: confirm the sentence of imprisonment for a fixed term of 2 years commencing on 6 October 2011 and expiring on 5 October 2013; (b)On Count 9: confirm the sentence of imprisonment for a fixed term of 3 years but order that it commence on 6 April 2012 and expire on 5 April 2015; (c)On Court 11: confirm the sentence of imprisonment for 5 years and 6 months but order that it commence on 6 April 2013 and expire on 5 October 2018, with a non-parole period of 3 years to expire on 5 April 2016; (d)On Count 1: confirm the sentence of imprisonment for 7 years and 6 months but order that it commence on 6 January 2014 and expire on 5 July 2021, with a non-parole period of 5 years to expire on 5 January 2019; (e)On Counts 7 and 8: quash the sentences and impose sentences of imprisonment for 6 years and 6 months to commence on 6 October 2014 and expire on 5 April 2021, with non-parole periods of 4 years and 6 months to expire on 5 April 2019; (f) On Counts 5 and 6: confirm the sentences of imprisonment for 7 years but order that it commence on 6 October 2015 and expire on 5 October 2022, with a non-parole period of 5 years to expire on 5 October 2020; (g)On Count 3: confirm the sentence of imprisonment for 7 years but order that it commence on 6 April 2016 and expire on 5 April 2023, with a non-parole period of 5 years to expire on 5 April 2021; (h)On Count 2: confirm the sentence of imprisonment for 7 years but order that it commence on 6 April 2016 and expire on 5 April 2023, with a non-parole period of 5 years to expire on 5 April 2021; (i)On Count 4: confirm the sentence of imprisonment for 12 years but order that it commence on 6 October 2016 and expire on 5 October 2028, with a non-parole period of 7 years to expire on 5 October 2023. The total effective sentence is imprisonment made up of a non-parole period of 12 years with a balance of term of 5 years. The first date on which the applicant will be eligible for release on parole is 5 October 2023. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – whether sentencing judge failed to take into account early guilty pleas for various counts – whether sentencing judge erred in failing to take into account the applicant voluntarily disclosing the conduct that resulted in two counts – whether sentence is manifestly excessive – leave to appeal against sentence granted – appeal allowed – applicant resentenced Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), s 6 Cases Cited: Atholwood v The Queen [1999] WASCA 256; (1999) 109 A Crim R 465 Baumer v The Queen [1998] HCA 67; (1998) 166 CLR 51 CM v R [2008] NSWCA 195; (2008) 187 A Crim R 197 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Doe v R [2013] NSWCCA 248; (2013) 187 A Crim R 328 Hallak v R [2014] NSWCCA 48 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45, (2010) 242 CLR 520 Ibbs v The Queen [1987] HCA 46; (1987) 163 CLR 447 Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45, (2010) 242 CLR 520 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; (2014) 252 CLR 601 Lewins v R [2007] NSWCCA 189; (2007) 175 A Crim R 40 LJ v The Queen [2010] NSWCA 289 Martin v R [2013] NSWCCA 24 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Nguyen v R [2007] NSWCCA 14 Paxton v R [2011] NSWCCA 242; (2011) 219 A Crim R 104 Postiglione v R [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295 Power v The Queen [1974] HCA 36; (1974) 131 CLR 623 R v AJP [2004] MSWCCA 434; (2004) 150 A Crim R 575 R v Araya [2005] NSWCCA 283; (2005) 155 A Crim R 555 R v BA [2014] NSWCCA 148 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; (2009)195 A Crim R 1 R v DAJ [2102] NSWCCA 143 R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 R v MAK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272; (2006) 164 A Crim R 481 R v Newman [2004] NSWCCA 113 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; (2001) 127 A Crim R 369 R v Russell (unreported, NSWCCA, 21 June 1996). R v Scott [2005] NSWCCA 152 R v Scott [2003] NSWCCA 286 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v J B Loiterton [2005] NSWSC 905 R v I R Hall [No 2] [2005] NSWSC 890 Ryan v The Queen [2001] HCA 21; (2001) 206 CLR 267 Sivell v R [2009] NSWCCA 286 Tunivono v R [2013] NSWCCA 176 Windle v R [2011] NSWCCA 277 Category: Principal judgment Parties: MRM (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: W Hunt/A Bonnor (Applicant) S Dowling SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate