NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: BKX v Children's Guardian [2015] NSWCATAD 155 Hearing dates: 5 May 2015 Decision date: 24 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Higgins, Principal Member Decision: The decision of the respondent is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – administrative review – respondent determined to refuse the applicant's application for a working with children check clearance – applicant subject to an assessment requirement by the respondent due to having been charged in December 2007 with an offence of assault occasioning actual bodily harm of a nine-year old boy in his care – the charges were subsequently dismissed – the applicant asserted he had acted in self-defence – the applicant was also the subject of a number of subsequent police intelligence and event reports - whether the respondent's decision that the applicant poses a risk to the safety of children by reason of the trigger events and the other matters raised is the correct and preferred decision Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 (repealed) Crimes Act 1900 Cases Cited: AYU v NSW Office of the Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 69 BKE v Office of Children's Guardian & Anor [2015] NSWSC 523 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; 60 CLR 336 Commission for Children and Young People v V [2002] NSWSC 949 Commissioner for Children and Young People v FZ [2011] NSWCA 11 M v M [1988] HCA 68: 166 (CLR) 69 YG and GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247 Category: Principal judgment Parties: BKX (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Lowson Solicitors: Macedone Legal (Applicant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 1410410 Publication restriction: Pursuant to subs 64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the name of the applicant, the name of a child referred in the material filed and the name of any other person from which the name of the applicant or a child could be identified is not to be published or broadcasted without the leave of the Tribunal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate