NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: LCM Litigation Fund Pty Ltd v Coope; Coope v LCM Litigation Fund Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 992 Hearing dates: 17-19 and 22 June 2015 Decision date: 24 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Stevenson J Decision: Plaintiff entitled to terminate defendant's employment contract for misconduct Catchwords: CONTRACTS – employment as managing director – whether failure to disclose element of "wind down" proposal with joint venturer was serious misconduct for the purposes of managing director's employment contract – whether failure to disclose employment proposal with joint venturer simultaneously with submission of separation proposal to company was serious misconduct; CORPORATIONS – whether any damages to which defendant might be entitled unavailable by reason of s 200B or capped by reason of s 200F(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Adami v Maison de Luxe Ltd (1924) 35 CLR 143 Blyth Chemicals Ltd v Bushnell (1933) 49 CLR 66 Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd v Overliese [2011] FCAFC 24 Breen v Williams [1996] HCA 57; 186 CLR 71 LCM Litigation Fund Pty Ltd v Coope; Coope v LCM Litigation Fund Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1156 North v Television Corporation Ltd (1976) 11 ALR 599 Rankin v Marine Power International Pty Ltd [2001] VSC 150 Category: Principal judgment Parties: LCM Litigation Fund Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Patrick Mark Coope (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: F M Douglas QC with S Fendekian (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) J Clarke SC with Y Shariff (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate