NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 8) [2015] NSWSC 1036 Hearing dates: 28 July 2015 Date of orders: 28 July 2015 Decision date: 28 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: See paragraph [21] Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Practice and procedure – Opening address to jury by counsel for accused following the opening address of the Crown – Where counsel commented upon suggested submissions which might be made by counsel for co-accused – Where counsel made reference to material which was prejudicial to the co-accused – Discussion of limitations placed upon an opening address by counsel for an accused - Where counsel's address exceeded those limitations in a way which was prejudicial to the co-accused – Where application made by co-accused that the jury be discharged - Application granted – Jury discharged Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v Gibb (1982) 7 A Crim R 385 R v MM [2004] NSW CCA 81 R v Oulds [2014] QCA 223 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina - Crown Roger Caleb Rogerson - Accused Glen Patrick McNamara - Accused Representation: Counsel: Mr C Maxwell QC - Crown Mr G Thomas - Accused Rogerson Mr C Waterstreet - Accused McNamara
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions - Crown Katsoolis and Co - Accused Rogerson Kings Law Group - Accused McNamara File Number(s): 2014/1574082014/156921 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate