NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kang v Khan [2015] NSWCATAP 156 Hearing dates: 23 April 2015 Date of orders: 30 July 2015 Decision date: 30 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: P Wass SC, Senior Member K Rosser, Senior Member Decision: 1. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. 2. The appeal is otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: Appeal - Whether decision not fair and equitable; whether new evidence was not reasonably available at time of the hearing; whether denial of procedural fairness Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Khan v Kang [2014] NSWCATAP 48 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 John Prendergast & Vanessa Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Annetts v McCann [1990] HCA 57; (1990) 170 CLR 596; 97 ALR 177; (1990) 65 ALJR 167; 21 ALD 651 Kioa and Ors v West [1985] HCA 81; (1985) 159 CLR 550; (1985) 62 ALR 321; (1986) 60 ALJR 113; 9 ALN N28 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shinwoo Kang and Sung Ju Lee – Appellants Nazmul Nisha Khan - Respondent Representation: Parties self-represented File Number(s): AP 14/60570 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 9 December 2014 Before: D Goldstein, Senior Member File Number(s): HB 14/09386
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate