NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sparkes v R [2015] NSWCCA 203 Hearing dates: 28 July 2015 Date of orders: 28 July 2015 Decision date: 28 July 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [35], [37] Price J at [1] Fagan J at [36] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against aggregate sentence – utilitarian discount for pleas of guilty – whether applied to indicative sentences – whether aggregate sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 112(2), 117, 154A(1)(a) and 195(1)(a) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 11 and 32 Cases Cited: Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; (2010) 79 NSWLR 1Click here to enter text. JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 Makarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2006) 228 CLR 357 R v MAK; R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Anthony Sparkes (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Paingakulam (Applicant) N Adams SC and M Rabsch (Crown) File Number(s): 2013/287629 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 20 June 2014 Before: Colefax SC DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate