NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 9) [2015] NSWSC 1056 Hearing dates: Written submissions Date of orders: 31 July 2015 Decision date: 31 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: See paragraph [39] Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Costs – Where Subpoena issued to the Australian Crime Commission for production of documents – Where Commission relied upon statutory immunity – Where statutory immunity and relevant authorities were drawn to the attention of the accused's legal representatives – Where Commission repeatedly foreshadowed the making of an application for costs in the event that it was necessary to move to set the Subpoena aside – Where Commission afforded the accused's representatives the opportunity to withdraw the Subpoena without seeking costs – Where matter proceeded to hearing and Subpoena was set aside – Whether costs should be awarded in favour of the Commission – Relevance of the right of an accused to a fair trial in determining whether costs should be awarded – Order for costs made in favour of the Commission Legislation Cited: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) Cases Cited: Carter v Managing Partner, Mallesons Stephen Jaques (1993) 11 WAR 159 Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59; (1990) 170 CLR 534 R v Barbaro (1992) 108 ACTR 1 R v Bartlett [2014] WASC 492 R v Micalizzi (NSWSC 13 November 1987 unreported) R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 619 Texts Cited: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina – Crown Roger Caleb Rogerson - Accused Glen Patrick McNamara – Accused/Respondent Australian Crime Commission - Applicant Representation: Counsel: Mr C Maxwell QC - Crown Mr G Thomas – Accused Rogerson Mr C Waterstreet – Accused McNamara Mr A Markus (Solicitor) – Australian Crime Commission
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate