NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lin v R [2015] NSWCCA 204 Hearing dates: 21 April 2015 Decision date: 03 August 2015 Before: Simpson J at [1]; R A Hulme J at [30]; Bellew J at [31] Decision: (1) Leave granted to appeal;
(2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Criminal Code (Cth), s 400.9 - money laundering - notice of motion seeking indictment be stayed or quashed - motion dismissed - application for leave to appeal, Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F(3)(a) - dealing with money or other property reasonably suspected to be proceeds of crime - whether indictment defective without identification of class of indictable offences from which money is reasonably suspected of being proceeds - purpose of sub-s (2) - specifies various kinds of conduct proof of which is sufficient to satisfy s 400.9(1), Criminal Code (Cth) - expands operation of sub-s (1) - leave granted - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 4G Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F(3)(a) Criminal Code (Cth), s 4.1, s 400.2, s 400.3, s 400.4, s 400.5, s 400.6, s 400.7, s 400.8, s 400.9, s 400.13 Financial Transactions Reports Act 1988 (Cth), s 31 Cases Cited: Ansari v R [2007] NSWCCA 204; 70 NSWLR 89 Chen v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2011] NSWCCA 205; 83 NSWLR 224 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Heng-Sheng Lin (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G James QC/P Lange (Applicant) R J Bromwich SC/K Ginges (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate