NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pioneer Studios Pty Ltd v Hills [2015] NSWCA 222 Hearing dates: 22 June 2015 Decision date: 04 August 2015 Before: McColl JA at [1]; Basten JA at [2]; Simpson JA at [42] Decision: (1) Allow the appeal and set aside the orders made by the Deputy President on 10 July 2014.
(2) In their place:
(a) dismiss the appeal from the decision of the senior arbitrator of 13 January 2011;
(b) order that the appellant worker pay the costs of the respondent employer of that appeal;
(3) Order that the respondent pay the appellant's costs in this Court.
(4) Grant the respondent a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW). Catchwords: WORKERS COMPENSATION - respondent injured at party held on work premises - whether injury arose out of employment - whether injury arose in course of employment - respondent awarded compensation in Workers Compensation Commission by presidential member - injury found to have arisen in course of employment - injury found to have arisen out of employment - appeal from decision of presidential member - appeal limited to appeal in point of law - Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW), s 353(1)
APPEAL - whether Workers Compensation Commission erred in point of law in finding injury arose in course of employment - Hatzimanolis v ANI Corporation Ltd [1992] HCA 21; 173 CLR 473 - Comcare v PVYW [2013] HCA 41; 250 CLR 246 - whether Workers Compensation Commission erred in point of law in finding injury arose out of employment
APPEAL - whether Workers Compensation Commission erred in determining terms and conditions of employment by reference to respondent's subjective perception - employer defines the terms of employment, Henderson v Commissioner of Railways (WA) (1937) 58 CLR 281 - Pioneer Studios Pty Ltd v Hills [2012] NSWCA 324 - appeal allowed Legislation Cited: Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), ss 4, 9, 9A Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW), ss 288, 352, 353 Cases Cited: Badawi v Nexon Asia Pacific Pty Ltd t/as Commander Australia Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 324; 75 NSWLR 503 Comcare v PVYW [2013] HCA 41; 250 CLR 246 Commonwealth v Oliver [1962] HCA 38; 107 CLR 353 Danvers v Commissioner for Railways [1969] HCA 64; 122 CLR 529 Dhanhoa v The Queen [2003] HCA 40; 217 CLR 1 Hatzimanolis v ANI Corporation Ltd [1992] HCA 21; 173 CLR 473 Hills v Pioneer Studios Pty Ltd [2011] NSWWCCPD 30 Hills v Pioneer Studios Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWWCCPD 42 Hills v Pioneer Studios Pty Ltd [2014] HCASL 75 Mercer v ANZ Banking Group Ltd [2000] NSWCA 138; 48 NSWLR 740 Pioneer Studios Pty Ltd v Hills [2012] NSWCA 324 Roncevich v Repatriation Commission [2005] HCA 40; 222 CLR 115 Zickar v MGH Plastic Industries Pty Ltd (1996) 187 CLR 310 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Pioneer Studios Pty Ltd (Appellant) Kathryn Hills (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L King SC (Appellant) B J Gross QC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate