NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: AB v Curry & Anor [2015] NSWSC 1063 Hearing dates: 21 July 2015 Decision date: 22 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: White J Decision: Refer to paras [119], [124] and [125] of judgment Catchwords: WILLS, PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION – family provision – claim for greater provision out of the deceased's estate by her adult foster child – executors agreed that the plaintiff is an eligible person, that there were factors warranting her application and that inadequate provision was made for her – whether plaintiff should be entitled to the whole of the small estate – consideration of factors relevant to increased provision – held that increased provision should be made, but not the whole or most of the estate Legislation Cited: Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Burke v Burke [2015] NSWSC 195 Hamilton v Moir [2013] NSWSC 1200 Kleinig v Neal (No 2) [1981] 2 NSWLR 532 Mayfield v Lloyd-Williams [2004] NSWSC 419 McGrath v Eves [2005] NSWSC 1006 Plunkett v Bull (1915) 19 CLR 544 Slack v Rogan [2013] NSWSC 522; (2013) 85 NSWLR 253 Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AB (Plaintiff) Aileen Esme Curry (1st Defendant) Juliet Anna Greentree (2nd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Ang (Plaintiff) K Morrissey with L Clarke (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate