NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SHCAG Pty Ltd v Hume Coal Pty Ltd [2015] NSWLEC 122 Hearing dates: 25, 26, 27 March 2015 and 27, 29, 30 April 2015 Decision date: 04 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pain J Decision: 1. The amended summons filed in Court 29 April 2015 is dismissed. 2. Costs reserved. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – challenge to assessment under Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 of exploration licence enabling drilling of boreholes on private land under the Mining Act 1992 – statutory regime for gaining access to private land for exploration under the Mining Act – whether Minister complied with duty to examine and take into account environmental impacts as required by s 111 of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act – whether activity likely to significantly affect impact on the environment pursuant to s 112 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) s 5, s 110, s 111, s 112 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2005 (NSW) cl 228(3) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 136 Fluoridation of Public Water Supplies Act 1957 (NSW) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Mining Act 1992 (NSW) s 29, s 31, s 138, s 140, s 141, s 142, s 143, s 152, s 155, s 252 Cases Cited: Arnold v Minister Administering the Water Management Act [2014] NSWCA 386 Bailey v Forestry Commission of New South Wales (1989) 67 LGRA 200 Bentley v BGP Properties Pty Ltd [2006] NSWLEC 34; (2006) 145 LGERA 234 Brown v Coal Mines Australia Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 143; (2010) 76 NSWLR 473 Bulga Milbrodale Progress Association Inc v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure [2013] NSWLEC 48, (2013) 194 LGERA 347 Eurobodalla Fluoride Issues Inc v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2014] NSWLEC 182 F Hannan Pty Ltd v Electricity Commission of New South Wales (1983) 51 LGRA 353 Foster v Minister for Customs and Justice [2000] HCA 38; (2000) 200 CLR 442 Fullerton Cove Residents Action Group Incorporated v Dart Energy Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 38; (2013) 195 LGERA 229 Garrett v Freeman (No 4) [2007] NSWLEC 389 Gilbank v Bloore (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 273 Guthega Development Pty Ltd v Minister Administering the National Parks and Wildlife Act (NSW) 1974 (1986) 7 NSWLR 353 Hoxton Park Residents Action Group Inc v Liverpool City Council [2011] NSWCA 349; (2011) 81 NSWLR 638 Hume Coal Pty Ltd v Alexander (No 3) [2013] NSWLEC 58; (2013) 194 LGERA 319 Kivi v Forestry Commission of NSW (1982) 47 LGRA 38 Maroun v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1284; (2009) 112 ALD 424 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZGUR [2011] HCA 1; (2011) 241 CLR 594 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39, (2009) 259 ALR 429 Minister for Planning v Gray [2006] NSWLEC 720; (2006) 152 LGERA 258 Newcastle & Hunter Valley Speleological Society Inc v Upper Hunter Shire Council and Stoneco Pty Limited [2010] NSWLEC 48 Oshlack v Rous Water [2011] NSWLEC 73; (2011) 184 LGERA 365 Oshlack v Rous Water (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 111; (2012) 189 LGERA 243 Parks and Playgrounds Inc v Newcastle City Council [2010] NSWLEC 231; (2010) 179 LGERA 346 Parramatta City Council v Hale (1982) 47 LGRA 319 Prasad v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155 Queensland Conservation Council Inc v Minister for the Environment and Heritage [2003] FCA 1463 Telstra Corporation Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 133; (2006) 67 NSWLR 256 Category: Principal judgment Parties: SHCAG Pty Ltd (Applicant) Hume Coal Pty Ltd (First Respondent) New South Wales Minister for Resources and Energy (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr R White (Applicant) Mr SB Lloyd SC with Ms JE Davidson (First Respondent) Mr RP Lancaster SC with Mr BK Lim (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate