NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Daniels v State of New South Wales (No 6) [2015] NSWSC 1074 Hearing dates: 7, 8, 9 September 2015 Date of orders: 11 September 2015 Decision date: 11 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Publication of reasons for conclusion reached regarding questions for the jury. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – procedure – trial – functions of judge and jury – defences – qualified privilege – statutory defence of qualified privilege – element of reasonableness – whether a question for the jury – consideration of Davis v Nationwide News Pty Ltd Legislation Cited: Criminal Code (Qld) (63 Vict No 9), s 377 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 132 Defamation Act 1974 (NSW), s 22 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) ss 30; 22 Defamation Act 1958 (NSW) s 17 Cases Cited: Austin v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1984] 2 NSWLR 383 Barbaro v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd (1990) 20 NSWLR 493 Calwell v Ipec Australia Ltd [1975] HCA 47; 135 CLR 321 Davis v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 699; 71 NSWLR 606 Hanrahan v Ainsworth (1990) 22 NSWLR 73 Hunt v Radio 2SM Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] NSWDC 43 Telegraph Newspaper Company Ltd v Bedford [1934] HCA 15; 50 CLR 632 Watt v Longsdon (1930) 1 KB at 153 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Dr Christopher Sydney Daniels (plaintiff) State of New South Wales (first defendant) Louise Manwaring (second defendant) David Tooney (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff in person S Chrysanthou (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate