NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Williamson v Carneys Lawyers [2015] NSWSC 1080 Hearing dates: 27, 28 and 29 July 2015 Decision date: 05 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: 1. Judgment for the first and third defendants.
2. Unless a written application is made to my associate within seven days for a different order, order the plaintiff to pay the first and third defendants' costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: TORT – professional negligence - solicitor acting for purchaser of rural property – land in vicinity of property subject to proposed quarry development - whether solicitor failed to advise plaintiff to make enquiries regarding possible development on neighbouring properties – whether solicitor had obligation to ensure that client had conducted enquiries – whether plaintiff would have purchased property regardless of advice – negligence not established – causation not established
DAMAGES - whether any loss having regard to Potts v Miller– no damage suffered Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2005 (NSW), s 5D Environment Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 149 Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s 325 Professional Standards Act 1994 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ceal Ltd v Minister for Planning [2007] NSWLEC 302 Codelfa Constructions Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 Gates v City Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd [1986] HCA 3; 160 CLR 1 Hadley v Baxendale (1854) Exch 341 at 354; 156 ER 145 Henville v Walker [2001] HCA 52; 206 CLR 459 Jones v Dunkel (after (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kizbeau v WG and B Pty Ltd (1995) 184 CLR 281 Potts v Miller (1940) 64 CLR 282 Wallace v Kam [2013] HCA 19; 250 CLR 375 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hugh Francis Arthur Williamson (Plaintiff) Carneys Lawyers Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Rabobank Australia Limited (Second Defendant) Wallace Edward Meakes (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff in person A Sullivan QC (First and Third Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate