NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Susan Rae Radcliffe v Tile Rescue Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCATAP 160 Hearing dates: 13 July 2015 Date of orders: 05 August 2015 Decision date: 05 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Dr J Renwick SC, Senior Member K Rosser, Senior Member Decision: Leave to appeal is refused. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL – Appeal Panel – no question of principle – leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Neville v Lam (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 607 Texts Cited: None Category: Principal judgment Parties: Susan Rae Radcliffe (Applicant) Tile Rescue Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Bill Hyde (with leave), employee of the Respondent File Number(s): AP 15/14275 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 13 February 2015 Before: K Ross, General Member File Number(s): HB 14/00190
reasons for decision
Introduction 1. The issues on this appeal and application for leave to appeal are whether there is any demonstrated error of law, and if not, whether leave to appeal should be granted. We answer 'no' to both those questions, and for the reasons which follow, refuse leave and dismiss the appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate