NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chen v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2015] NSWCATAD 167 Hearing dates: 28 November 2014, 21 January 2015, 2 April 2015 Decision date: 11 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Leal, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: Firearms Act - revocation of licence - reasonable cause to believe - may not personally exercise continuous and responsible control over firearms because of his way of living or domestic circumstances. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1996 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2006 Cases Cited: Austrac Operations Pty Ltd v New South Wales (2003) FCA 1013 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR 336. Drake v Minister of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1970) 2 ALD 60 Fielden & Fielden v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2000] NSWADT 156 Keane v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police [2008] NSWADT 68 LY v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police [2004] NSWADT 115 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10 Ward v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2000] NSWADT 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jiaojie Chen (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: J Chen (Applicant in person) Bartier Perry (Respondent) File Number(s): 1410444
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate