NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kuypers v Ashton Coal Operations Pty Ltd & Anor [2015] NSWSC 1122 Hearing dates: 4 & 5 August 2015 (Evidence on Commission); 7 August 2015 Date of orders: 07 August 2015 Decision date: 07 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: I permit the second defendant to rely upon the evidence of Mr Lance Martin and Mr Roger Lord to the extent to which it may be ruled admissible in due course. I give the plaintiff leave to file the further amended statement of claim dated 30 July 2015 in court and to rely upon it for the purpose of the case. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – civil – application for leave to rely on additional expert reports – where non-compliance with directions previously made – application of overriding efficiency principles Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW); Evidence Act 1995 (NSW); Water Act 1912 (NSW) Texts Cited: Practice Note SC CL 5 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Benjamin Kuypers (Plaintiff) Ashton Coal Operations (First defendant) Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Ltd (Second defendant) Representation: Counsel: B. Dooley SC with M. Perry (Plaintiff); R.A. Cavanagh SC with Ms D.J. Dinkha (First defendant); A.R. Harris QC with I.D. Roberts SC and S.L.C. Flett (Second defendant)
Solicitors: Taylor & Scott Lawyers (Plaintiff); Curwoods Lawyers (First defendant); Lee Legal Group (Second defendant) File Number(s): 2012/393861
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate