NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Djmal v Cemal & Ors [2015] NSWSC 1125 Hearing dates: 6 August 2015 Decision date: 06 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: White J Decision: Refer to para [32] of judgment. Catchwords: EQUITABLE REMEDIES – resulting trust – presumption of advancement – constructive trust – failure of joint endeavour – plaintiff purchased property for her son – property transferred to son and his wife – purchase made for the purpose of the son's building a house on the land for the plaintiff and her daughter to live in – son did not build any house – relations within the family broke down – held that the presumption of advancement was rebutted as the intention to advance was conditional on the property's being used to build a house for the plaintiff and her daughter, so that the property was held on trust upon failure of the condition, and alternatively a Baumgartner v Baumgartner constructive trust arose upon failure of the parties' joint endeavour
EQUITABLE REMEDIES – resulting trust – Quistclose trust – plaintiff paid money into a newly opened bank account held by her son and his wife – money was to be used by the son to build a house for the plaintiff – son and his wife made unauthorised withdrawals of most of the money prior to a freezing order being made – held that the money was paid under a common intention Quistclose trust, that the bank account was held on a resulting trust for the plaintiff when the purpose of the payment failed, and that the son and his wife are liable to restore the trust funds Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Currie v Hamilton [1984] 1 NSWLR 687 Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd [1970] AC 567 Australasian Conference Limited v Mainline Constructions Pty Limited (in liq) 141 CLR 335 Re MF Global Australia Ltd (No 2) (in liq) [2012] NSWSC 994; (2012) 267 FLR 27 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nursel Djmal (Plaintiff) Ozay Cemal (1st Defendant) Bernadine Mau Elizabeth Haare (2nd Defendant) National Australia Bank Limited (3rd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Fozzard (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate