NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sell & Parker Pty Ltd v NSW Minister for Planning [2015] NSWLEC 130 Hearing dates: 30 July 2015 Date of orders: 30 July 2015 Decision date: 30 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Preston CJ Decision: (1) The proceedings are dismissed.
(2) The applicant is to pay the costs of the proceedings of the respondent. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – motion for summary dismissal of proceedings – appeal regarding State significant development application – competency of appeal – whether any determination of development application – whether letter from respondent constituted notice of determination of the development application by the consent authority – no actual determination of development application – letter did not constitute notice of determination – at the time appeal was commenced development application not taken to have been determined by refusal – no determination of the consent authority against which the applicant could appeal – proceedings dismissed
COSTS – Court not to make order for costs in Class 1 appeal unless fair and reasonable in the circumstances – whether order for costs fair and reasonable in the circumstances – question of competency of appeal a question of law preliminary to evaluation of merits of application and potentially and actually determinative of proceedings – respondent made offer to applicant prior hearing to discontinue proceedings with no costs order – sufficiently clear that there was no notice of determination that could found an appeal – fair and reasonable to order applicant to pay costs of the respondent Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 78A, 81, 82(1), 89C, 89D, 89E, 89F, 89H, 97 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cll 51, 83-85B, 85A, 100, 113(1) Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 rr 3.7(2), 3.7(3)(a) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sell & Parker Pty Ltd (Applicant) NSW Minister for Planning (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P N Lalich (Solicitor) (Applicant) Mr A Shearer (Barrister) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate