NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Alpha v R [2015] NSWCCA 225 Hearing dates: 17 August 2015 Decision date: 17 August 2015 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Price J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [3] Decision: 1. Extend time for the filing of the Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal to 2 June 2015; grant leave to appeal; and allow the appeal.
2. Quash the sentence imposed in the District Court on 17 October 2013 and in lieu, sentence the applicant to imprisonment for 6 years with a non-parole period of 3 years 8 months. The sentence is to date from 9 October 2012. The non-parole period will end on 8 June 2016 and the overall term will expire on 8 October 2018. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – importing a marketable quantity of border controlled drug – 684 grams of cocaine – whether starting point of 12 years manifestly excessive – principles of sentencing for drug importation offences – application of guideline judgment in R v Wong and Leung (1999) 48 NSWLR 340 – relevance of quantity of drug - where applicant's role greater than that of mere courier – no manifest excess established in starting point or resulting sentence
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – importing a marketable quantity of border controlled drug – 684 grams of cocaine – where arithmetical error in applying discount for guilty plea and assistance conceded – re-exercise of sentencing discretion – total discount increased to 50 per cent – applicant re-sentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 16G Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6(3) Criminal Code (Cth) s 307.2 Cases Cited: Adegoke v R [2013] NSWCCA 193; 234 A Crim R 280 Burns v R [2008] NSWCCA 260 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; 79 NSWLR 1 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 Kuti v R [2012] NSWCCA 43 McGeown v R [2014] NSWCCA 314 Minall and Watkins v R [2003] NSWCCA 311 R v Mas Rivadavia; R v El Akkaoui; R v Aksu [2004] NSWCCA 284; 61 NSWLR 63 R v Nguyen; R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238; 205 A Crim R 106 R v Vasquez [2003] NSWCCA 94 R v Wong & Leung [1999] NSWCCA 420; 48 NSWLR 340 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Young v R [2007] NSWCCA 114 Category: Principal judgment Parties: "Alpha" (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Stratton SC with Ms F Graham (Applicant) Mr Lenehan with Ms Bathurst (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate