NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Villalon v R [2015] NSWCCA 229 Hearing dates: 3 August 2015 Date of orders: 26 August 2015 Decision date: 26 August 2015 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Adams J at [88]; Fagan J at [89] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal against sentence.
(2) Appeal allowed.
(3) The sentence imposed in the Supreme Court on 18 September 2014 is quashed.
(4) The applicant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 7 years 6 months with a non-parole period of 5 years 1 month commencing on 28 February 2012 and expiring on 27 March 2017, with a balance of term of 2 years 5 months commencing on 28 March 2017 and expiring on 27 August 2019. The applicant will become eligible for release on parole at the end of the non-parole period. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentencing – discount for guilty plea – whether offer to plead guilty to manslaughter indicated at earliest reasonable opportunity – no circumstances eroding utilitarian value of guilty plea – offer to plead guilty made during committal proceedings – sentencing judge erred in discounting head sentence by 20% rather than 25%
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentencing – non-parole period – whether primary judge erred by determining non-parole period prior to determining head sentence and taking into account special circumstances – sentencing judge made no such error Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 23A, 24 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 22, 21A, 44 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6(3) Cases Cited: Douar v R [2005] NSWCCA 455; 159 A Crim R 154 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 Markham v R [2007] NSWCCA 295 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Musgrove v R [2007] NSWCCA 21; 167 A Crim R 424 Pitt v R [2014] NSWCCA 70 R v AB [2011] NSWCCA 229; 59 MVR 356 R v BA [2014] NSWCCA 148 R v Blacklidge (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 12 December 1995, unrep) R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; 195 A Crim R 1 R v Cardoso [2003] NSWCCA 15; 137 A Crim R 535 R v Chen [2012] NSWSC 1000 R v Dawes [2004] NSWCCA 363 R v Dennis; R v Elwood [2014] NSWSC 1615 R v Forbes [2005] NSWCCA 377; 160 A Crim R 1 R v Harmouche [2005] NSWCCA 398; 158 A Crim R 357 R v Hollaway [2013] NSWSC 218 R v Huynh [2005] NSWCCA 220 R v Kain [2013] NSWSC 638 R v Moffitt (1990) 20 NSWLR 114 R v Oinonen [1999] NSWCCA 310 R v P [2004] NSWCCA 218 R v Pennisi [2001] NSWCCA 326 R v Stambolis [2006] NSWCCA 56; 160 A Crim R 510 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383 R v Tobar [2004] NSWCCA 391; 150 A Crim R 104 Trujillo-Mesa v R [2010] NSWCCA 201 Williams v R; Saunders v R [2006] NSWCCA 33 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Villalon (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: G Bashir SC (Applicant) N Noman SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate