NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Riverstone Parade Pty Limited v Blacktown City Council [2015] NSWLEC 137 Hearing dates: 27 May 2015 Decision date: 21 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pain J Decision: 1. The Amended Summons Commencing an Appeal dated 16 April 2015 is dismissed. 2. Riverstone Parade Pty Limited is to pay Blacktown City Council's costs unless a motion setting aside that order is filed on or before 4 September 2015. Catchwords: APPEAL – appeal under s 56A of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 – questions of law must be identified – statutory construction of clause in State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Regional Growth Centres) 2006 stating no development consent for development unless does not increase flood levels – no breach of procedural fairness in reasoning relying on absence of flood modelling – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) s 79C Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) s 56A Riverstone West Development Control Plan 2009 s 1.4.1, s 2.2, s 4.2, Appendix C State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Regional Growth Centres) 2006 cl 2, cl 20 Cases Cited: Brimbella Pty Ltd v Mosman Municipal Council (1985) 79 LGERA 367 Commissioner for the Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd [1994] FCA 1074; (1994) 49 FCR 576 Dainford Ltd v Lamb (1985) 3 NSWLR 255 Farnell Electronic Components Pty Ltd v Collector of Customs (1996) 72 FCR 125 Forgall Pty Ltd v Greater Taree City Council [2015] NSWLEC 61 Hub Action Group Incorporated v Minister for Planning [2008] NSWLEC 116; (2008) 161 LGERA 136 Ju Sheng Xia v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 27 ALD 668 Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81; (1985) 159 CLR 550 Leotta v Public Transport Commission (NSW) (1976) 50 ALJR 666 Manning v Bathurst Regional Council (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 186; (2013) 199 LGERA 147 Maxnox Pty Ltd v Hurstville City Council [2006] NSWLEC 146; (2006) 145 LGERA 373 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Riverstone Parade Pty Limited v Blacktown City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1005 Tuite v Wingecarribee Shire Council (No 2) [2008] NSWLEC 321 Water Board v Moustakas [1988] HCA 12; (1988) 180 CLR 491 Texts Cited: DC Pearce and RS Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia, (8th ed 2014, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Riverstone Parade Pty Limited (Appellant) Blacktown City Council (Respondent Representation: Counsel: Mr AE Galasso SC with Ms S Fitzpatrick (Applicant) MR DT Miller SC with Mr N Case (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate