NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Da Rin v Duffy (No 3) [2015] NSWCATOD 88 Hearing dates: 20 May 2015 Decision date: 24 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Acting Judge K P O'Connor, AM, Deputy President Decision: That the applicant pay 50 per cent of the respondent's costs of the proceedings at first instance, as agreed between the parties or as assessed. Catchwords: COSTS – Respondent's application for its costs of defending proceedings following setting aside of Tribunal decision by Court of Appeal –– whether there are exceptional circumstances warranting such an order – order made in relation to part of the costs incurred. Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997, s 88. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Local Government Act 1993 Cases Cited: AT v Commissioner of Police [2010] NSWCA 131 Australian Securities Commission v Aust-Home Investments Ltd and Ors [1993] FCA 401; (1993) 44 FCR 194 Da Rin v Duffy [2015] HCASL 56 Duffy v Da Rin [2014] NSWCA 270 La France v Clarence [2004] NSWADT 256 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 One.Tel Limited v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 270 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; ex p Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 Category: Costs Parties: John Da Rin (Applicant) Kevin Michael Duffy (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Loofs (Respondent) Solicitors: T H Bray (Applicant) Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s): 1420274
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate