NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Clarke v R [2015] NSWCCA 232 Hearing dates: 5 June 2015 Date of orders: 28 August 2015 Decision date: 28 August 2015 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Garling J at [39]; Hamill J at [124] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL – appeal – sentence – offence of cultivating prohibited plant in large commercial quantity – guilty plea – disputed question of fact as to whether all items located were "plants" – whether sentencing judge erred in finding as to number of "plants" – proper scope of appeal against sentence - whether finding of fact open to sentencing judge – whether sentencing judge failed to properly take into account the applicant's subjective circumstances – whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21A, 54A, 54B Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 5F, 6 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 33 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 3, 23, 33, 36Z, 43; Sch 1 Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic), s 71 Cases Cited: AB v The Queen [1999] HCA 46; (1999) 198 CLR 111 AB v R [2014] NSWCCA 339 Allesch v Maunz [2000] HCA 40; (2000) 203 CLR 172 Aoun v R [2011] NSWCCA 284 Baxter v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 237; 173 A Crim R 284 Camm v R [2009] NSWCCA 141 CO v R [2011] NSWCCA 148 Colville v R [2015] NSWCCA 149 Crawford v R [2013] NSWCCA 269 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v JG [2010] NSWCCA 222; 220 A Crim R 19 Filippou v The Queen [2015] HCA 29 Fleming v The Queen [1998] HCA 68; (1998) 197 CLR 250 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Kardoulias v R [2005] NSWCCA 456; 159 A Crim R 252 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; (2014) 252 CLR 601 Kyriakou v The Queen [1988] 9 Leg Rep SL 4 Lacey v Attorney-General (Qld) [2011] HCA 10; (2011) 242 CLR 573 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 351 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA39; (2011) 244 CLR 240 Peters v R [2013] NSWCCA 324 The Queen v Francis-Wright [2005] VSCA 79 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 R v Clarke [2014] NSWDC 35 R v Ion (1996) 89 A Crim R 81 R v Khouzame [2000] NSWCCA 505 R v Kurtic (1996) 84 A Crim R 57 R v Kyriakou (1987) 29 A Crim R 50 R v Ly [2010] NSWDC 229 R v Merritt [2004] NSWCCA 19; 59 NSWLR 557 R v O'Donoghue (1988) 34 A Crim R 397 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 SBF v R [2009] NSWCCA 231; 198 A Crim R 219 Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 Turnbull v Medical Board (NSW) [1976] 2 NSWLR 281 Victorian Stevedoring & General Contracting Co Pty Ltd v Dignan (1931) 46 CLR 73 Texts Cited: Filippou v The Queen [2015] HCATrans 104 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joshua Jack Clarke (Applicant) Crown Representation: Counsel: G Bashir SC (Applicant) N Williams (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate