NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mun v R [2015] NSWCCA 234 Hearing dates: 10 August 2015 Date of orders: 28 August 2015 Decision date: 28 August 2015 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Adams J at [71]; Beech-Jones J at [72] Decision: (1) The applicant be granted leave to appeal.
(2) The appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentencing – whether sentencing judge erred in finding no expression of remorse – reliance on statements by offender contained in tendered reports as evidence of remorse – weight, if any, to be given to such material where offender does not give evidence – whether sentence manifestly excessive – whether regard may be had to notional starting point where it is not contended that the reduction for a guilty plea is excessive – sentence not plainly unjust or unreasonable Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 98 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 21A(3)(i) Cases Cited: Adzioski v R [2013] NSWCCA 69 Alpha v R [2015] NSWCCA 225 Alvares v R; Farache v R [2011] NSWCCA 33; 209 A Crim R 297 Butters v R [2010] NSWCCA 1 Charlesworth v R [2009] NSWCCA 27 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Graham v R [2009] NSWCCA 212 Halac v R [2015] NSWCCA 121 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29; 195 CLR 665 MacDonald v R [2007] NSWCCA 105 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 McGeown v R [2014] NSWCCA 314 Papworth v R [2011] NSWCCA 253 Pfitzner v R [2010] NSWCCA 314 Pham v R [2010] NSWCCA 208 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v Henry [2007] NSWCCA 90 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v P [2001] NSWCA 473; 53 NSWLR 664 R v PB [2008] NSWCCA 109; 184 A Crim R 552 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; 127 A Crim R 369 Rutkowskyj v R [2008] NSWCCA 10 SZ v R [2007] NSWCCA 19; 168 A Crim R 249 The Queen v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 TYN v R [2009] NSWCCA 146; 195 A Crim R 345 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Yang v R [2012] NSWCCA 49; 219 A Crim R 550 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Steven Mun (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: D O'Neil (Applicant) H Baker (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate