NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sommerville v Sommerville [2015] NSWSC 1247 Hearing dates: 21 August 2015 Date of orders: 31 August 2015 Decision date: 31 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Summons dismissed with costs. Catchwords: EQUITY – equitable remedies – plaintiff claims his father (the defendant) represented that he would devise to the plaintiff a property if the plaintiff helped construct a house on the property – the defendant/father disputed that he made to his son the representations alleged – whether the representations were made – whether the plaintiff relied on the alleged representations – whether the plaintiff suffered any detriment in reliance on the promises – HELD – representations were not made and were not relied upon. Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900, s 74J Cases Cited: Austotel Pty Ltd v Franklins Self Serve- Pty Limited (1989) 16 NSWLR 582 ER Ives Investment Limited v High [1967] 2 QB 379 Dillwyn v Llewelyn (1862) 45 ER 1285 Malouf v Malouf (2006) 65 NSWLR 449 Minogue v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1999) 84 FCR 438 Ramsden v Dyson & Thornton (1866) LR 1HL 129 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Rodney Keith Sommerville Defendant: Rupert George Sommerville Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: in person Defendant: J. Turnbull
Solicitors: Defendant: Colin A. Simmons, Hosie & Partners File Number(s): 2015/96833 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate