NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cummins Generator Technologies Germany GmbH v Johnson Controls Australia Pty Limited [2015] NSWCA 264 Hearing dates: 14 and 15 October 2014 Decision date: 03 September 2015 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Gleeson JA at [176]; Leeming JA at [177] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct under Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – whether misrepresentations made in quotation for supply of an alternator as to compatibility with existing equipment – where quotation not accepted – technical information provided in respect of machinery subject of quotation – misrepresentations to be assessed in context of dealings between parties
TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct under Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – causation – whether legal causation established – dependent on purpose of statute as related to the circumstances of the particular case
DAMAGE – misleading and deceptive conduct – no strict requirement to prove a "no transaction" or "different transaction" case
EVIDENCE – expert evidence – UCPR, r 31.28 – party seeking to rely on another party's expert report – report must be "served back" – exceptional circumstances required for the grant of leave if party has not "served back" – UCPR, r 31.28(4)(a) Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Abigroup Contractors Pty Ltd v Sydney Catchment Authority (No 3) [2006] NSWCA 282; 67 NSWLR 341 Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v GSF Australia Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 26; 221 CLR 568 Azzi v Volvo Car Australia Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 319 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 25; 238 CLR 304 Downs v Chappell [1997] 1 WLR 426 Gates v City Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd [1986] HCA 3; 160 CLR 1 Henville v Walker [2001] HCA 52; 206 CLR 459 Hicks v Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Commission [2001] FCA 586; 110 FCR 582 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Ingot Capital Investments Pty Ltd v Macquarie Equity Capital Markets Ltd [2008] NSWCA 206; (2009) 73 NSWLR 653 Leadenhall Australia Limited v Peptech Ltd [2001] NSWCA 272 Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd [1998] HCA 69; 196 CLR 494 Nikac v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1988] FCA 400; 20 FCR 65 Port Stephens Council v Samson [2007] NSWCA 299 Community Association DP270253 v Woollahra Municipal Council (No 2) [2014] NSWLEC 8 PT Ltd v Spuds Surf Chatswood Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 446 Singer v Berghouse [1994] HCA 40; 181 CLR 201 Street v Luna Park Sydney Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1; 223 FLR 245 Travel Compensation Fund v Robert Tambree [2005] HCA 69; 224 CLR 627 Warren v Coombes [1979] HCA 9; 142 CLR 531 Westpac Banking Corporation v Jamieson [2015] QCA 50 Williams v Pisano [2015] NSWCA 177 Yacoub v Pilkington (Australia) Ltd [2007] NSWCA 290 Texts Cited: Heydon, Trade Practices Law: Competition and Consumer Law Lockhart, The Law of Misleading and Deceptive Conduct (3rd ed, 2011) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Cummins Generator Technologies Germany GmbH (Appellant) Johnson Controls Australia Pty Limited (First Respondent) Energy Power Systems Australia Pty Limited (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Christie SC; H Pintos-Lopez (Appellant) A J McInerney SC; O Jones (First Respondent) D T Miller SC; J A Hogan-Doran (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate