NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Warringah Council v ProjectCorp Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 100 424 440) [2015] NSWLEC 141 Hearing dates: 29 - 30 May 2013 and 15, 18 July 2013 Date of orders: 03 September 2015 Decision date: 03 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Craig J Decision: Proceedings 51226 of 2012: (1) The Defendant is convicted of the offence as charged. (2) The Defendant is fined the sum of $35,000. Proceedings 51227 of 2012: (3) The Defendant is convicted of the offence as charged. (4) The Defendant is fined the sum of $10,000. Both Proceedings: (5) Pursuant to s 248(1) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, the Defendant is ordered to pay the Prosecutor's investigation costs of $1,945.20. (6) The Defendant must pay the Prosecutor's costs of both proceedings, such costs to be determined in accordance with s 257G of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986. (7) Exhibits may be returned. Catchwords: ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES – offence against s 125(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) – erosion and sediment controls not implemented as required by development consent – offence against s 120(1) of Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW) – pollution of waters – plea of guilty to each offence – sentencing principles – erosion and sediment control facilities inadequate – discharge of sediment-laden water the consequence of both offences – offence against s 125(1) undermines integrity of planning and development control system – reasonably foreseeable harm – conduct not reckless in committing pollution offence – failure to implement conditions of consent of low to medium objective seriousness – pollution offence of low objective seriousness – prior penalty infringement notices not an aggravating factor – no prior convictions – remorse and contrition – not appropriate to exercise discretion under s 10 of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – principle of totality – fine – costs. Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Application (No 3 of 2002) [2004] NSWCCA 303; 61 NSWLR 305 Axer Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 113 LGERA 357 Blue Mountains City Council v Carlon [2008] NSWLEC 296 Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 Cessnock City Council v Bimbadgen Estate Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 140 Environment Protection Authority v Barnes [2006] NSWCCA 246 Environment Protection Authority v Moolarben Coal Operations Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 80 Environment Protection Authority v Snowy Hydro Ltd [2008] NSWLEC 264; 162 LGERA 273 Environment Protection Authority v Tea Garden Farms Pty Ltd [2012] NSWLEC 89 Environment Protection Authority v Waste Recycling and Processing Corporation [2006] NSWLEC 419; 148 LGERA 299 Gittany Constructions Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 242; 145 LGERA 189 Johnson v The Queen [2004] HCA 15; 78 ALJR 616 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Mosman Church of England Preparatory School v Warringah Council [2009] NSWLEC 1190 Plath v Hunter Valley Property Management Pty Ltd [2010] NSWLEC 264 R v De Simoni [1981] HCA 31; 147 CLR 383 R v Holder; R v Johnston [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 R v Paris [2001] NSWCCA 83 R v Scott [2005] NSWCCA 152 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383 R v Van Nam Nguyen [2002] NSWCCA 183 State Pollution Control Commission v Hunt (1990) 72 LGRA 316 Thorneloe v Filipowski [2001] NSWCCA 213; 52 NSWLR 60 Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Warringah Council (Prosecutor) ProjectCorp Australia Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Arch (Prosecutor) M C Fraser (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate