NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sedgwick v Varzonek [2015] NSWSC 1275 Hearing dates: 23 & 24 October 2014 Date of orders: 14 September 2015 Decision date: 14 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Plaintiff's Succession Act claim and contract claim fail. Plaintiff succeeds in equitable estoppel. Catchwords: EQUITY – claim for family provision – eligibility as de facto partner – eligibility due to close personal relationship – nature of plaintiff's relationship with the deceased – equitable estoppel – whether statements were promissory or created expectations or assumptions on plaintiff's part upon which deceased might anticipate that plaintiff would rely. Legislation Cited: Interpretation Act 1987, s 21C Legal Profession Act 2004 Mental Health Act 1990, Chapter 4, Part 3 Mental Health Act 2006, Part 2, Division 3 Property (Relationships) Act, s 5(1) Succession Act 2006, s 57, Chapter 3 Cases Cited: Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571 Bar-Mordecai v Hillston [2004] NSWCA 65 Dridi v Fillmore [2001] NSWSC 319 Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community (2002) 209 CLR 95. Fung v Ye [2007] NSWCA 115 Harkness v Harkness [2011] NSWSC 1421 R v Reis [2005] NSWSC 707 Sharpless v McKibbin [2007] NSWSC 1498 Sidhu v Van Dyke (2005) 251 CLR 505 Walton's Stores (Interstate) Limited v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Richard Charles Sedgwick Defendant: Krystyna Varzonek Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: M. Willmott SC; A. Blank Defendant: P.O'Loughlin
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate