NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Hair Industrie Penrith Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1278 Hearing dates: 26 August 2015 Decision date: 26 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: The application for judgment for want of evidence under r 29.10 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules is dismissed. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – judgments and orders – defendants' application for judgment for want of evidence under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 29.10 –whether court is satisfied that judgment for the plaintiff could not be supported on the evidence. Legislation Cited: - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 29.10 Cases Cited: - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Sydney Investment House Equities Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 814 - Commonwealth of Australia v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 84; (1991) 174 CLR 64 - Union Bank of Australia Ltd v Puddy [1949] VLR 242 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Romona Kraissa (Plaintiff) Hair Industrie Penrith Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Hair Industrie Merrylands Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Steve Choukair (Third Defendant) Mohamad Choukair (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Painter SC/J Gatland (Plaintiff) W R Chan (Third and Fourth Defendants)
Solicitors: Adams & Partners (Plaintiff) Clamenz Lawyers (Third and Fourth Defendants) File Number(s): 2014/86490
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate