NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Akbari v R; Nasiri v R [2015] NSWCCA 240 Hearing dates: 13 August 2015 Decision date: 07 September 2015 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; Garling J at [81] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – co-offenders – demand money in company with menaces – participate in criminal group – whether error in consideration of mental health issues – no causal link between mental health issues and offending – whether error in determination of objective seriousness of count 1 – where applicants sought to extort substantial sum of money from business owner – where applicants threatened harm to victim and family – no error in finding offence extremely serious – sentence not manifestly excessive – appeal dismissed
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – co-offenders – demand money in company with menaces – participate in criminal group – whether error in distinguishing between roles of offenders – whether error in regard to parity principles – open to judge to differentiate between applicants in the way that he did – no error established – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 99(2), 93T(1), 95, 347, 350 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) s 13(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 44 Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) s 54(3)(a) Cases Cited: Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 HL v Regina; YG v Regina [2014] NSWCCA 43 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 McMenemy v R [2009] NSWCCA 50 Newman v R [2012] NSWCCA 69 R v Cage [2006] NSWCCA 304 R v Smith [2004] NSWCCA 95; 144 A Crim R 577 R v Wilson [2002] NSWCCA 65 Regina v Daetz; Regina v Wilson [2003] NSWCCA 216; 139 A Crim R 398 Texts Cited: "Sentencing in complicity cases — Part 1: Joint criminal enterprise", Sentencing Trends and Issues, No 38, Judicial Commission of New South Wales, 2009 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nazir Ahmad Akbari (Applicant) Mohammed Nasiri (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr W Hunt (Akbari) Mr P Wass SC (Nasiri) Ms M Cinque (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate