NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Chidiac [2015] NSWCCA 241 Hearing dates: 20 August 2015 Date of orders: 09 September 2015 Decision date: 09 September 2015 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Price J at [2] Beech-Jones J at [53] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against aggregate sentence – whether aggregate sentence manifestly excessive. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 323(a) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 21A(2)(j), 44(2C), 53A, 53A(2)(b), 54B and 54B(4) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) ss 24(1), 25(1) and 29 Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) s 7(1) Cases Cited: Beale v R [2015] NSWCCA 120 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 Cullen v R [2014] NSWCCA 162 Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Knight v R [2015] NSWCCA 222 Malicki v R; R v Malicki [2015] NSWCCA 162 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 R v Dusan Krstic [2005] NSWCCA 391 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Roy Chidiac (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Brady (Applicant) T Smith (Respondent)
Solicitors: S Evans – Michael Croke & Co (Applicant) C Hyland – Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2012/486172013/283529 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 15 August 2014 Before: Colefax SC DCJ File Number(s): 2012/48617 2013/283529
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate