NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Hi-Fi Sydney Pty Ltd (Administrator Appointed) [2015] NSWSC 1297 Hearing dates: 22 June 2015 Date of orders: 23 June 2015 Decision date: 23 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Leave to amend interlocutory process declined. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – interlocutory process in nature of cross-claim – application to amend interlocutory process – where arguable case sought to be put on amended interlocutory process – whether prejudice occasioned to plaintiff of permitting amendment – absence of prejudice to defendant of not permitting amendment – held, leave to amend interlocutory process declined. Legislation Cited: (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 436C, s 440B, s 440D, s 444F(4) (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919, s 129(1), Sch 6 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Carsingha Investments Pty Limited (ACN 169 790 523) (plaintiff) Hi-Fi Sydney Pty Ltd (administrator appointed) (ACN 136 479 895) (first defendant) Simon Patrick Nelson (second defendant) Karamika Pty Ltd (ACN 006 636 997) (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Sulan w R May (plaintiff/respondent) G Sirtes SC w J Shepard (first and second defendants/applicants)
Solicitors: Arnold Bloch Leibler (plaintiff/respondent) Mills Oakley Lawyers (first and second defendants/applicants) Mills Oakley Lawyers (third defendant) File Number(s): 2015/159028
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate