NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Raveena Singh Rai v State Transit Authority of New South Wales [2015] NSWIRComm 27 Hearing dates: 27 August 2015 Date of orders: 08 September 2015 Decision date: 08 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Walton J, President; Stanton C; Newall C Decision: Leave to appeal is refused Catchwords: LEAVE TO APPEAL – unfair dismissal – first instance decision to dismiss application – tests for leave to appeal – no matter of principle – no matter beyond interests of parties – decision open to Commissioner at first instance – leave not required in public interest – leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Industrial Relations Act 1996 Cases Cited: Antonakopoulos v Sate Bank of NSW (1999) 91 IR 385 Byrne v Australian Airlines Limited [1995] HCA 24; 185 CLR 410 Hosemans v Commissioner of Police (No 4) (2005) 150 IR 263 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy, Airlines and Utilities Union and Liverpool City Council [2014] NSWIRComm 17 Raveena Singh Rai v State Transit Authority of NSW [2014] NSWIRComm 1027 Stegbar v Transport Workers' Union (2008) 173 IR 350 Western Sydney Area Health Service v Gibson (2001) 109 IR 359 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Raveena Singh Rai (Appellant) State Transit Authority of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Fozzard (Appellant) C Magee (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate