NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gal v R [2015] NSWCCA 242 Hearing dates: 20 August 2015 Date of orders: 09 September 2015 Decision date: 09 September 2015 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Price J at [2 ] Beech-Jones J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal be granted; (2) The Appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: SENTENCE APPEAL – break and enter – no assessment of objective seriousness by sentencing judge – no reference to facts of offence – reference to seriousness in course of argument – error demonstrated – if sentencing discretion re-exercised higher sentence would be imposed – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 – s 9, 21A(2)(j) - Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s 6(3) Cases Cited: - Attorney General's Application (No 1) under s 26 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Re; R v Ponfield; R v Scott; R v Ryan; R v Johnson [1999] NSWCCA 435; 48 NSWLR 327 - Cowan v R [2015] NSWCCA 118 - Cullen v R [2014] NSWCCA 162 - Delaney v R; R v Delaney [2013] NSWCCA 150 - Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 - Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 - O'Grady v R [2015] NSWCCA 168 - Opacic v R [2013] NSWCCA 294 - R v Campbell [2014] NSWCCA 102 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jay Clifford Gal - Applicant The Queen – Respondent Representation: Counsel: G.A. Brady – Applicant Ms T. Smith – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate